The additional speed of f2.8 vs f4 is one factor, so is focus breathing and 24mm vs 28mm Nikon AF-S Nikkor 400mm f/2.8E FL ED VR the 24-70 and 24-200. Also
The 70-200mm f/2.8 S is the much sharper lens. In fact, it’s sharper at f/2.8 in the corners than the 24-200mm f/4-6.3 ever gets in the corners. Here’s 105mm: The same is true here – they’re not even close. I’m a fan of the 24-200mm f/4-6.3 overall and gave it a pretty favorable review, but it just isn’t in the same league as theHowever, the cheaper Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8 Sports lens goes toe to toe with the Nikon for sharpness in real-world shooting, while matching other aspects of the Nikon’s image quality, autofocus speed and the stabilization effectiveness. 3. Tamron SP 70-200mm f/2.8 Di VC USD G2.I have both the 24-70 2.8E VR (I used to have the 24-70 f2.8G) and the new 24-70 f4s and I can tell you that the 24-70 f4s is sharper across the frame and from wide open and has superb overall IQ, at least as good as the 24-70 f2.8E VR, which I think is a superb "standard focal range" zoom. Nikkor Z 70-180mm f/2.8 and Nikkor Z 180-600mm f/5.6-6.3 VR lenses officially announced and available for pre-order; Nikkor Z 70-180mm f/2.8 and 180-600mm f/5.6-6.3 VR lenses additional coverage; Nikon released new firmware updates for four super telephoto Z lenses In July of this year I owned and shot the following lenses 70-200mm f/2.8VRII, 200-500mm f/5.6VR, 200-400mm f/4VR and the 300mm f/2.8AFS II. The 300mm f/2.8 AFS II has the same optical formula as the VRII, but lack nano-coating, VR and the VR element that moves within the lens. I was heading out for a 9 day photo workshop in British Columbia Nikon Z5 Nikon Z6 II Nikon AF-S Nikkor 70-200mm f/2.8G ED VR II Tamron SP AF 90mm F/2.8 Di Macro Tamron SP 35mm F1.8 Di VC USD +7 more ANSWER: This question has not been answered yet. fre6krc.